<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - Re: AMD's Athlon 64 FX, more details emerge</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2009-01-07T22:17:37-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152387"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152386"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152385"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#0"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152387">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2004-07-16T11:48:21-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Supreet Virdi</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Re: AMD's Athlon 64 FX, more details emerge</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152387</link>
        <description>you see 3000+ is actually equals to 3.0ghz intel pentium4, its basically depends on the core of processor, AMD processors has shorter pipelines, hence makin it run faster whereas Intel processors has longer pipelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
thats why: -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2200+ = 2.2ghz pentium&lt;br /&gt;
2400+ = 2.4ghz pentium&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But now since Northwood core has hit the market, its nothing like 2600+ equals to 2.6C, its like 2.4C = 2600+&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
new stats are somewhat like this: -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMD 64 2800+ = 2.8 intel&lt;br /&gt;
AMD 64 3200+ = 3.2 intel</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152386">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2004-07-16T11:44:35-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Mohawk</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Re: AMD's Athlon 64 FX, more details emerge</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152386</link>
        <description>i found a more exact number the 3000 is actually running at 2.167 ghz </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152385">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2004-07-16T11:42:08-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Mohawk</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Re: AMD's Athlon 64 FX, more details emerge</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#152385</link>
        <description>the athlon xp 3000 doesnt run at 2.6 its actually 2.2 but this run equivintinly to a p4 3.0 ghz</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#0">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2004-07-16T11:34:04-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Amit Hologavkar</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: AMD's Athlon 64 FX, more details emerge</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/29433/#0</link>
        <description>How naming is done for AMD processors ? As when name says Athlon3000+ it is actually 2.6Ghz.rather than 3 Ghz</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
