<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - High Performance with Apache?  I think not...</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2008-12-04T20:25:55-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#15499"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#0"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#15499">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2002-10-27T00:38:00-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Alexander Brown</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: High Performance with Apache?  I think not...</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#15499</link>
        <description>&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.zeus.com/purchase/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.zeus.com/purchase/&lt;/a&gt; lists the coist of the apache server as being very expensive.  £11/1200 or so. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dont know much about this site, but if its anything like any other HW site, then spending ther above ammount on a server is out of the question, when a product like apache will do a very comparable job for free. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spending on the server HW is required as this at least kills any stability concerns. Also it would go agains the spirit of a site like this, unless they HAD to opt for some proprierty solution, like the above. &lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#0">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2002-10-19T21:13:23-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Paul Monaghan</dc:creator>
        <title>High Performance with Apache?  I think not...</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/3165/#0</link>
        <description>&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who as architected web serving clusters for some of Canada's largest ISPs and companies I can tell you first hand that the Apache web server is the last web server that you would want to use in a high performance environment.  Check out Zeus, &lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.zeus.com,&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.zeus.com,&lt;/a&gt; not only can it handle 4 to 5 times the amount of connections per second as Apache it also has virtually linear scalability on multi processor machines.  Zeus also sports a central administration system that allows you to administer an entire cluster from one web interface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
