<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - &quot;Microsoft's leaner approach to Vista security&quot;</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/48253/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2008-10-12T23:35:22-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/48253/?l=1#0"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/48253/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/48253/?l=1#0">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2005-08-29T16:05:33-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Yahoda Klaus</dc:creator>
        <title>&quot;Microsoft's leaner approach to Vista security&quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/48253/?l=1#0</link>
        <description>It seems that Microsoft did not implement all that has been planned. Compare todays article on cnet&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://news.com.com/Microsofts+leaner+approach+to+Vista+security/2100-7355_3-5843808.html?tag=nefd.lede&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://news.com.com/Microsofts+leaner+approach+to+Vista+securi...=nefd.lede&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of much feared NGSCB only TPM makes its way to Vista, and as M$ says&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There is some concern that (the TPM) could be used in a privacy-impairing way(...)to quell those concerns, Microsoft won't require PC makers to include the security chip in their systems and the feature will be turned off by default in PCs that do ship with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
