Hardware Analysis Community Forums http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/ 2009-11-07T21:49:55-05:00 http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/ /images/halogo.gif text/html 2006-03-11T04:49:24-05:00 punqewe sabbato http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#393812 Thanks for the quick reply,I mad ethe changes to 1.45 and turned my PCI down to 100MHz. I had it at 1.475 just before this and ran 3D mark for the hell of it and checked my temps after...only went up to 39 celcius after the full run.<br /> <br /> Might try playing a few hours of FEAR to see how it handles that. text/html 2006-03-11T04:39:12-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#393807 Sounds good. I wasn't able to break 2.6 and had frequent lockups at 2.55. You might have better luck\<br /> with that venice core. My winchester has the best performance and temps at 2.45 (stock cooling)<br /> <br /> When I was at 2.5 I did move my cpu voltage at 1.45<br /> <br /> But right now at 2.45 I got.<br /> ram 333mhz 2.5-3-3-6 2.8v<br /> 245x10x4 1.4375v<br /> pci 100mhz<br /> pci syn 33.33 <br /> <br /> I've read multiple times, its best to leave the pci clock at 100mhz<br /> <br /> text/html 2006-03-11T03:47:29-05:00 punqewe sabbato http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#393800 I'm kinda new to this OC'ing game and so far I've gotten my a8n-sli with a a64 3200+ venice up to 2.55GHz.<br /> <br /> The thing that I'm wondering about is at 2.55 my CPU voltage is now at about 1.4375,is that going to be enough power for everything to run right?<br /> <br /> Changes I made<br /> -RAM 2.5-3-3-6 @ 333MHz (1gig of kingston ddr sdram 2x512)<br /> -CPU <a class="ext" href="mailto:255x10@1.437">255x10@1.437</a>5 volt<br /> -HTT-4x<br /> -pci express-105MHz<br /> -RAM voltage-2.8<br /> -PCI synch-33.33<br /> <br /> My temps are about 30 celcius at idle and at load I've yet to break 50. Prolly about 45-46 celcius. I just wanna know if I should increase my voltage on my CPU,I also might try to get to 2.65 after about a week at this setting for testing. Maybe then for sure I should increase it?<br /> <br /> -Any help would be awesome. text/html 2006-02-01T04:38:16-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#378148 ok, now stable at 2.45 at 35c idle<br /> <br /> With my bfg 7800gt @ 470/1150 scores are:<br /> <br /> a3: 80,165<br /> 05: 7648<br /> <br /> text/html 2006-02-01T04:14:33-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#378141 Works like a champ!! <img src="/images/smilies/smile1.gif" width="14" height="14" border="0" alt=":)" title=":)"><br /> <br /> I'm at 2.4 now and cpu temp is 34c idle.<br /> <br /> My problem was either the actual ram voltage or the timings. I was using 2-3-3-6.<br /> I changed that to 2.5-3-3-6 but I did that before. The only difference was ram volt.<br /> <br /> Thanks jared B. Thats all i wanted was someone with the same mobo to point out some settings.<br /> Thanks Chris McNally also for all your help!! <br /> <br /> Now as long as i'm stable and temps seem good thats I'll i reallly need to worry about? text/html 2006-02-01T03:57:10-05:00 El Seņor http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#378136 here's what mine's set at:<br /> <br /> Under RAM settings:<br /> Timings at 2.5-3-3-6 (mine locks at anything tighter than this)<br /> Bump RAM down to 333 mhz (don't go any lower)<br /> HTT at 4x<br /> <br /> Under jumperless:<br /> 10x multi @ 265<br /> pci 105 mhz (i've heard this makes no difference)<br /> ram volt 2.8<br /> cpu volt 1.4375<br /> pci sync 33.33<br /> <br /> hope this helps... text/html 2006-01-31T23:42:39-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#378035 I'm probably the one confused. <br /> <br /> Under my dram configuration I can change the memory clock. This is where I've been changing <br /> it from 400mhz, 333mhz, and 266mhz, and 200.<br /> <br /> Under this option i can also change my timings.<br /> text/html 2006-01-31T07:37:08-05:00 Chris McNally http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377805 One of us is confused. If you're at 229 x 10, then your ram is at 229, not 200. text/html 2006-01-31T02:20:59-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377741 i thoght i'd did that. changing the ram to 333 or 266. isn't that what he was talking about?<br /> <br /> It didn't seem to do any good even with the ram at 266. <br /> <br /> Actually I've been running pretty good for the last couple hours at 229x10 and ram at 200. <br /> <br /> now i have my cpu voltage at 1.5 is that ok for my cpu? (as long as temps are good right?)<br /> 37c cpu<br /> 29c mb<br /> <br /> heres the problem. Even though i'm stable, i've seem to lost alot of performance. <br /> 3d05 went down over 1200 pts<br /> aquamark went from 78,000 to 61,000 text/html 2006-01-31T01:19:59-05:00 Chris McNally http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377701 If you're at 225 x 10 then your ram is running at 450 mhz, not 400. If you're stable there then it's time to use the ram divider Jared mentioned. text/html 2006-01-31T01:03:34-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377689 Yes, I've tried just about every combination.<br /> <br /> I've spent the last hour or so trying everything again.<br /> <br /> With my ram at 400mhz I seem to run stable at 2.25 (225x10) with cpu voltage at AUTO. CPU-z detects the voltage at 1.472. I have moved the cpu freq up one by one. I can get to 229 with no problems. cpu temp 35c<br /> <br /> Once I get to 2.3 (230x10) I lock up at bootup. I have to move my ram down to 333mhz. And I seem to run stable until i start loading any apps besides basic xp programs. This is with cpu voltage at auto and manual settings at 1.475, 1.4875, 1.5. Not sure if i want to go higher. CPU-z see cpu voltage at 1.472 and 1.488 (changes back in forth) Cpu temp is at 36c<br /> <br /> When I go any higher from 2.31 to 2.4 and I lock up at bootscreen. I've tried ram at 333 and 266.<br /> I've adjusted my cpu voltage manually from 1.475, 1.4875, 1.5. And still lockup at boot screen.<br /> <br /> as far is benchmark there is hardly any difference between 2.2ghz and 2.25ghz. Only difference is about 2c temp on cpu.<br /> <br /> text/html 2006-01-31T00:28:14-05:00 Chris McNally http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377685 Settings look ok, have you done what I suggested? text/html 2006-01-31T00:02:26-05:00 13 bats http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377674 I've tried that with the pci-e clock @ 100. That is my lowest option.<br /> <br /> heres my settings<br /> <br /> cpu freq: starts at 200<br /> pci express clock: 100mhz<br /> ddr voltage: auto (2.7v)<br /> cpu multipler: highest is 10<br /> cpu voltage: starts at .800 and 1.550 highest<br /> pci clock sync: 33.33mhz (options to auto, to cpu, 33.33)<br /> <br /> <br /> text/html 2006-01-30T07:55:33-05:00 Chris McNally http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377430 Shouldn't need to use a ram divider at the speeds he is currently going for-it's only a 10% oc at present. text/html 2006-01-30T07:06:40-05:00 El Seņor http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/54728/#377424 you need to use a RAM divider. under CPU Options where the memory timings are (you'll want to relax those a bit btw) you'll see your memory speed set a 400mhz. try 333mhz. <br /> <br /> under Jumperless settings set your cpu up around 240 with a 10 multiplier. if it's stable, try 245 and so on.<br /> Jared