<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2008-10-07T21:49:13-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513362"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513341"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513330"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513329"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513321"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513265"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513254"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513250"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513249"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513246"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513242"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513235"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513226"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513223"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513220"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513362">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-08T13:39:15-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Adam Kolak</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513362</link>
        <description>I hate Steve Jobs too, but I hate Steve Balmer almost just as much.  </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513341">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-08T02:44:50-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513341</link>
        <description>Practicality is a measure of functionality so, that fragment doesn't make sense to me. &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile5.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;:P&quot; title=&quot;:P&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[rant]I definitely agree that Apple places marketing as it's highest priority because that's all they really have.  In second place is, without a doubt, form.  Jobs doesn't care if it is the slowest computer in the world so long as it looks good (he'll advertise around the performance issue).  Functionality isn't even a word in Apple's dictionary (e.g. the mice prior to the &amp;quot;Mighty Mouse&amp;quot;)  Proof of this is the people that originally made these things: Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak.  Who do you always hear about?  Jobs, the one pushing the &amp;quot;prettiness.&amp;quot;  Who do you never hear about?  Wozniak, the brains that made the damn thing work.  If Jobs was a good man and pointed at his friend, Wozniak, when Mac was met with success, perhaps their computers wouldn't still be rubbish today.  Ballmer is everything Jobs isn't.  He sold the product and didn't lay claim to it.  He always pointed to the brains of the outfit, Gates.  As a result, Windows my not have all this useless crap that you &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; you might need (according to Apple).  No, no, instead, it is the most functional platform in the world with global support.  Apple vs Microsoft is a classic example of form vs function.  Proof is in where the profits go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now you know what I hate Jobs, the pompous a**hole, and by association, Apple.  Wozniak is a genius but Jobs always stands in the way of his limelight.[/rant]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edited to add the rant tags for those who can't be bothered with my opinion. &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile1.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;:)&quot; title=&quot;:)&quot;&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513330">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-08T00:44:09-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Adam Kolak</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513330</link>
        <description>Dr. Peaceful said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Well said Adam K.  Adding one more phase.  &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile4.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;;)&quot; title=&quot;;)&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Marketing before form.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Form before function.  Function before practicality.  Apple.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sad, but true.  Nice addition though, I can't believe I didn't think of that part.  </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513329">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-08T00:36:22-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dragon Peaceful</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513329</link>
        <description>Well said Adam K.  Adding one more phase.  &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile4.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;;)&quot; title=&quot;;)&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Marketing before form.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Form before function.  Function before practicality.  Apple.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513321">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T23:40:40-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Brendan Gonsalves</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513321</link>
        <description>Adam K. said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Form before function.  Function before practicality.  Apple.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
hahaha I like that one! &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile3.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;:D&quot; title=&quot;:D&quot;&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513265">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T18:00:56-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Adam Kolak</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513265</link>
        <description>Form before function.  Function before practicality.  Apple.  </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513254">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T15:39:57-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dragon Peaceful</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513254</link>
        <description>Ok, I just added more pictures of Mac's inside works.  See the first post for links.  Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513250">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T14:05:54-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Al-CID</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513250</link>
        <description>huh, how troublesome</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513249">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T13:52:51-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dragon Peaceful</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513249</link>
        <description>I noticed another thing.  The oldest iMac G5 they dissembled, only required loosening couple of screws in the back and the entire back panel comes loose, revealing all the components inside.  Whereas, later iMac's, it's required to remove the LCD from front (hard work), then able to see the hardware.  In my opinion, the oldest approach is much better engineering and makes repair much easier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who's bright idea was it, that you need to remove the LCD panel in order to change a simple HDD?  LOL &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile4.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;;)&quot; title=&quot;;)&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513246">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T13:14:30-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Tam the Bam</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513246</link>
        <description>&lt;br /&gt;
 Macs are &lt;i&gt;contempory&lt;/i&gt; computers. Designed for the materialistic generation who&lt;br /&gt;
 have no brains haha! Those Macs are just for folks who want to use computers for the&lt;br /&gt;
 basic needs. Business, multi media, surfing. But yea, it's a fancy laptop</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513242">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T10:56:10-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Mike L</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513242</link>
        <description>That was hilarious actually: &amp;quot;Warranty Void If Removed&amp;quot;. Yeah, oooookkkkayyyy! Who the HELL is going to go through all that trouble to open up their iMAC so that way they can void their warranty!? I guess it's just one of those things that they had to put in there. </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513235">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T08:23:52-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513235</link>
        <description>Integrated into the largest of the boards (motherboard/mainboard) most likely.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513226">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T06:20:41-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Al-CID</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513226</link>
        <description>where is the graphic card?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513223">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T05:57:44-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513223</link>
        <description>The hard drive looks almost square to me (proprietary).  I wouldn't be surprised if they contract the same people to make those hard drives as they contract to make iPod drives.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513220">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-10-07T05:29:12-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Dragon Peaceful</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Mac's look better [u]Inside[/u]!</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/68956/?l=1#513220</link>
        <description>Adam K. said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;...  On top of that you can see that they use all standard laptop parts: CPU, RAM, HDD, optical drive, etc. are all laptop parts.  ...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from the pictures in the site, the HDD is most likely a full 3.5&amp;quot; HDD, if you compare its size to the optical drive and looking at its cable connection.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
