<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - is it me ?</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2008-12-03T22:29:39-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536110"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536106"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536103"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536102"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536054"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536048"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536038"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536033"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536025"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536017"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536014"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536005"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535968"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535967"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#0"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536110">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-16T16:08:40-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>DublinGunner</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536110</link>
        <description>Yep, preeeeeeety damn stooopid if you ask me. But thats them boffins for ya!</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536106">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-16T14:57:00-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>john albrich</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536106</link>
        <description>DublinGunner said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;...Its been 'officially' released twice. Once about 3 weeks ago, and once again the other day. Apparently there was some sort of security flaw or something, but have obviously decided that it was minor enough to release it again.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Oh now that reeeeally makes technical sense...not. What were they thinking? Having the &amp;quot;5573&amp;quot; version &amp;quot;Final version&amp;quot; rumor out there didn't help the matter any, either. Arrrrggh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they make a Bill Gates &amp;quot;Bobble-head&amp;quot;? &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile16.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;:/&quot; title=&quot;:/&quot;&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536103">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-16T08:04:38-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>DublinGunner</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536103</link>
        <description>duncan bladen said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;ok john , i took your post the wrong way , sorry - iwasnt trying to say it was final release - my pc auto updates downloaded it , i took this as being an official download , or i wouldnt have got it ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its been 'officially' released twice. Once about 3 weeks ago, and once again the other day. Apparently there was some sort of security flaw or something, but have obviously decided that it was minor enough to release it again.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536102">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-16T07:30:03-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Duncan Bladen</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536102</link>
        <description>ok john , i took your post the wrong way , sorry - iwasnt trying to say it was final release - my pc auto updates downloaded it , i took this as being an official download , or i wouldnt have got it ?&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536054">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T17:59:05-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>john albrich</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536054</link>
        <description>Wasn't making an issue of your post. Sorry for any misunderstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was trying to emphasize it for those who might have already downloaded the 24April2006 &amp;quot;5512&amp;quot; version by Microsoft (or something in-between). Mainly because it can be a real problem/impossible to back-out an earlier version of an SP and then install a later version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted people to be &lt;i&gt;absolutely&lt;/i&gt; clear they don't need to be concerned that they might have installed a lower version and have a lot of work to do, or might have screwed things up. Confusion can be a problem when we have multiple threads that are related to the same topic.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536048">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T16:51:54-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Duncan Bladen</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536048</link>
        <description>There is NO difference between this &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; SP3 file and the &amp;quot;Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512&amp;quot; file Microsoft first made available 24April2008.  i didnt say there was a difference - i was not aware it had previously been released, my pc just picked it up through automatic  updates . see the first line of my post again ...i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536038">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T12:17:48-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>john albrich</dc:creator>
        <title>[b]No[/b] Difference Between SP3 of 24April2008(ver5512) and 06May2008</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536038</link>
        <description>duncan bladen said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3 - but i had trouble trying to install , because i had modified the boot ini file - [to change the boot screen] , but it is genuine - you dont have to re activate or anything -  i had to remove bootxp , and it installed ok , heres the link..&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b...layLang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;There is NO difference between this &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; SP3 file and the &amp;quot;Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512&amp;quot; file Microsoft first made available 24April2008.&lt;/b&gt; (RTM=Release To Manufacturing)&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Reminder: recommend performing a &lt;i&gt;total&lt;/i&gt; disk backup before installing any new Service Pack. A &lt;b&gt;freeware&lt;/b&gt; program, DriveImageXML is an reliable, fast, and easy-to-use program. DriveImage XML runs under Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista only. The program will backup, image and restore drives formatted with FAT 12, 16, 32 and NTFS. &lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using non-Windows/encrypted partitions, you may need to use a disk imaging program like XXclone&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.majorgeeks.com/XXCLONE_d5534.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.majorgeeks.com/XXCLONE_d5534.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.xxclone.com/index.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.xxclone.com/index.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just a few minutes ago, downloaded and compared this (apparently) 06May2008 file&lt;b&gt;*&lt;/b&gt; and the 24April2008 file. I performed bit-by-bit, MD5 hash, and SHA-1 hash compares. All 3 parameters were identical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512&lt;br /&gt;
Hashes that I calculated for&lt;br /&gt;
XP_SP3Ver5512RTM-KB936929-SP3-x86-ENU.exe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MD5=&lt;br /&gt;
bb25707c919dd835a9d9706b5725af58&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SHA-1 hash=&lt;br /&gt;
c81472f7eeea2eca421e116cd4c03e2300ebfde4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;RTM=Release To Manufacturing&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This is the SAME (version 5512)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
file as has been available since 24April2008 on the Microsoft website.&lt;br /&gt;
See:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/content/topic/70645/#534479&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534479&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/content/topic/70645/#534938&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534938&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;*&lt;/b&gt;From Microsoft website, &amp;quot;New&amp;quot; SP3 file:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b...layLang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Quick Details&lt;br /&gt;
File Name:	WindowsXP-KB936929-SP3-x86-ENU.exe&lt;br /&gt;
Version:	1&lt;br /&gt;
Knowledge Base (KB) Articles:	KB936929&lt;br /&gt;
Date Published:	5/6/2008&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
edit-add backup reminder and program info&lt;br /&gt;
(sorry for multiple clean-up edits...once again on max pain meds...blaacchhh)</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536033">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T09:55:04-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Duncan Bladen</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536033</link>
        <description>i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3 - but i had trouble trying to install , because i had modified the boot ini file - [to change the boot screen] , but it is genuine - you dont have to re activate or anything -  i had to remove bootxp , and it installed ok , heres the link..&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b...layLang=en&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536025">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T07:00:04-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Brendan Gonsalves</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536025</link>
        <description>Is it the final version?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so please post a link. I don't want to download an older SP3 update. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536017">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T04:57:31-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>john albrich</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536017</link>
        <description>Meats of Evil said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;Really?  You care to post the link of the download?  Last time I checked many people had SP3 but Microsoft hadn't officially released it since from what I understand it's still not complete, but from what I've read there's a Final Candidate Version release that supposedly is closed to finished and working fully.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discussion of various SP3 releases and version 5512 v. hypothetical &lt;b&gt;FINAL&lt;/b&gt; final version 5573&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/content/topic/70645/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in particular...reference to Microsoft SP3 release listed as &amp;quot;Final&amp;quot; with NO &amp;quot;RC&amp;quot; designation at the time of the post. Version Hashes were equal to 5512 version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/content/topic/70645/#534938&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534938&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536014">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T03:58:43-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Kieran Blenkarne</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536014</link>
        <description>Hmmm I wodner if you have to re activate after installing this.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536005">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-15T02:43:22-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Meats_Of_Evil</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#536005</link>
        <description>Really?  You care to post the link of the download?  Last time I checked many people had SP3 but Microsoft hadn't officially released it since from what I understand it's still not complete, but from what I've read there's a Final Candidate Version release that supposedly is closed to finished and working fully.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535968">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-14T20:32:10-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Adam Kolak</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535968</link>
        <description>Yes, I have seen somewhere that there is supposed to be a 10% improvement in performance over SP2 overall.  Service Packs generally increase security, fix issues, and improve performance.  </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535967">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-14T19:56:11-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Vitaliy (Administrator)</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#535967</link>
        <description>duncan bladen said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;i just downloaded and installed sp3 for xp , and my machine seems faster ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not just you.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#0">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-05-14T19:39:17-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Duncan Bladen</dc:creator>
        <title>is it me ?</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/71496/#0</link>
        <description>i just downloaded and installed sp3 for xp , and my machine seems faster ?&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
