<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="HardwareAnalysis.Com" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="">
        <title>Hardware Analysis - Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <description>Hardware Analysis Community Forums</description>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif" />
       <dc:date>2008-12-03T19:25:35-05:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542660"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542659"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542653"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542442"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542441"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542352"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542288"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542273"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542249"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542248"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542232"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542228"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542196"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542183"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#541869"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif">
        <title>Hardware Analysis</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/</link>
        <url>http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/halogo.gif</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542660">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-11T03:50:13-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542660</link>
        <description>I'm not running any clients now.  If I do run anything, it would probably be just on the server.  I need some time to chill first...</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542659">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-11T03:35:55-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/?o=20#542659</link>
        <description>they locked the thread? i guess that is a final answer. dang&lt;br /&gt;
so you boinc'ing now? if you do, who you boinc'ing for?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542653">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-10T23:52:39-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542653</link>
        <description>They locked the thread and nothing has been changed.  I no longer have any computers contributing to the F@H project.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542442">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-07T02:40:31-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542442</link>
        <description>BoT said: &lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;anyway, BOINC looks better and better. i have been runnin them for a while now too on my own team and maybe will dedicate more time to that as well. at least for the cpu's.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I have to agree with that.  I think I made some progress with Pande Group.  If they don't promise to make changes soon, I'll probably have to switch.  I would rather have my comps work for someone that cherishes a contribution--no matter how small.  The attitude I'm seeing over there is the stuff WMDs are made of.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542441">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-07T01:54:31-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542441</link>
        <description>it's the answer that i expected. &amp;quot;thats just how it is&amp;quot; type. &lt;br /&gt;
still doesn't explain why the 8800 fairs so much better then the 2600 or why not even a ps3, which has an amazing amount of fpu does not even fair well compared to the 8800. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
anyway, BOINC looks better and better. i have been runnin them for a while now too on my own team and maybe will dedicate more time to that as well. at least for the cpu's.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542352">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-06T06:08:51-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542352</link>
        <description>I don't think I'm going to get anywhere.  If I don't, I just might switch over to SETI or something...</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542288">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T16:15:56-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542288</link>
        <description>&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&amp;amp;t=4574&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&amp;amp;t=4574&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We'll see what comes of it...</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542273">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T10:37:48-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542273</link>
        <description>the forum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class=&quot;ext&quot; href=&quot;/action/r/http://foldingforum.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://foldingforum.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
my understanding is that the panda group and the founder himself actually read it and participate. </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542249">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T03:48:55-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542249</link>
        <description>Know of a good place to complain to them about this?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542248">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T03:34:47-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542248</link>
        <description>i agree ford. stanford has lost a bit of focus of what this is all about. &lt;br /&gt;
i blame nvidia for it. nvidia has big investments in the creation of the new clients and the pointing system.&lt;br /&gt;
i soooo wanted to buy an ati 3850 or 4850, i almost ordered it last week.&lt;br /&gt;
but it seems to me that nvidia cards are even favored over ati cards.&lt;br /&gt;
i had a 2600pro and only came up with 770 PPD vs the 8800gts with 4300-4700 PPD&lt;br /&gt;
i know the card is quiet superior to the 2600 and is not really a good comparison but by that much? thats like 6 times as many points per day. i can't get more then 330 PPD with any cpu i have, no matter how many or few instances i run. &lt;br /&gt;
way out of alignment</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542232">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-04T23:26:36-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542232</link>
        <description>I agree.  I have well over $1000 USD of processors (excluding all the other hardware) folding, 10 of which are on a 64-bit platform, yet it can't equate one $200 graphics card?  Sad...very sad.  I can't even make the 8800 GT or 8500 GT fold because they don't have 64-bit drivers yet.  I doubt my older X800 XL would ever support folding.  Basically the system is screwing those with larger investment (two-way processors, massive banks of memory, etc.) and power costs in favor of single card solutions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe they need to move away from FPU and more towards 64-bit ALU algorithms.  There is far more ALU performance in the world than there is FPU and ALU allows no room for guess work as there is no rounding throughout calculations.  Because ALU runs at least one op/clock faster than FPU, it is also significantly faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Stanford has a lot of pondering to do.  I have always been quite unimpressed with their cobble job software.  If they expect to make effective use of the home computer, they need to be quick to adapt new technologies like new instruction sets (SSE4) and x86-64.  Instead, they focus on PlayStation 3 and GPUs.  It almost makes me want to save my clocks for some other project that does value my expenditures.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542228">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-04T22:03:40-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542228</link>
        <description>right now i am folding solely on a 8800GTS 320&lt;br /&gt;
crazy point system</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542196">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-04T17:33:38-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542196</link>
        <description>You're producing 2000 more points than I am per time frame.  What hardware are you folding on?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542183">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-08-04T16:15:46-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>BoT</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#542183</link>
        <description>we are up again. from 722 to 716 and rising</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#541869">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2008-07-30T12:44:57-05:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>FordGT90Concept</dc:creator>
        <title>Re: Hardware Analysis Folding@Home Team (Part 2)</title>
        <link>http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/72055/#541869</link>
        <description>I think I'm falling in user rank. &lt;img src=&quot;http://media.hardwareanalysis.com/smilies/smile2.gif&quot; width=&quot;14&quot; height=&quot;14&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;:(&quot; title=&quot;:(&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added that link to my intro post.</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
